I’m in my mid 20s beside business and nouns degree. I eventually want to work within Europe, probably by working for a multinational corporation in the U.S. first. I’m trying to desire where on earth to live, and I’m wondering if it’s better for my goal to live surrounded by a place on the east coast, such as Boston, instead of a city style out on the west coast, such as San Francisco?

My rationale is that cities on the west coast might enjoy more international connections beside Asian economy, whereas cities on the east coast might be more tied beside European economy, due to the proximities to respectively other. Would this be true?

Besides the streetnames, not much is different. I individually would fairly live on the West Coast. The women are hotter, food and wine is better, the Pacific is better than the Atlantic, and empire look better (but are richer and more arrogant). The winters are not as cold any.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb


Resource related business question and answer:

The Simple Dollar » Making A Major Life Change: Is It Time For Kathy ...

There are plenty of better cities to live in if you want quality of ... I live and work downtown and love it (I walk ... pastures nearer DC or on the east coast that might suit them better.

Greenversations Question of the Week: Why are you or aren?t you ...

I arrive at work just before 6am, and these days (on the East coast) the early ... and it will) will you still want to live ... I feel better when I get to work and when I get home ...