The fuel surcharge is not surrounded by certainty a excise. It is an complement to the public sale price by the airline to recuperate the cost of rising fuel prices. Websites similar to redtag.ca include the fuel surcharge in the taxes. In other industries an increase in the underlying cost to produce the item would necessitate a ‘price increase’. Why is this not considered misleading and erroneous conduct to infer that this fuel charge is a rates.


I abhor Canadians, so sick of them. You guys hold a ridiculously elevated due. Don’t bring America into this.

Fuel is heavily tax, so they can ring up it a "fuel tax" because it costs them more to purchase the fuel, and they’re "endorsement the cost to the customer". Notice, however, that when the cost of fuel go down, the fuel surcharge doesn’t step away - but the taxes are so big and satisfactory fuel is purchased that it cannot be confidently proved that the charge surcharge is greater than the actual cost of the taxes on fuel. It would be drastically difficult for an individual to collect this information in apple-pie order to create a lawsuit underneath FALSE conduct.

Because the airline industry get their a** kissed by politicians. We bail them out of collapse and that’s how they rate us backbone.

Hey, Emmanuel - keep hold of watching Fox and letting them make clear to you who to abominate - idiot!


A due is levy by a governmental agency. A surcharge is a "temporary" excise from a private company within response to bazaar conditions.


Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BlinkList
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb